Monday, September 19, 2011
Nobody Makes Fun of Obama...
..better than Andrew Malcolm of The Los Angeles Times. Check out his blistering commentary on Obama's "urgent jobs plan" here.
A Couple Great Articles...
I found a couple of really great British opinion pieces today, courtesy of Jay Nordlinger of National Review. Both articles are in response to an amendment brought before Parliament that would have required that women considering an abortion receive counseling from a group separate from the group performing the abortion. This seemingly reasonable requirement, which has been influential in reducing abortion rates in Germany, was met with vitriol from the powers that be in Britain -- the same vitriol that we have come to expect here in America in response to even the most basic, commonsense regulations or restrictions on abortion. The first piece is by Mary Wakefield of The Spectator, and is one of the best articles I have ever read on the topic of abortion. I highly recommend it. The second is from The Telegraph, and while not as comprehensive as the first it makes some very good points. Among them is this:
In fact abortion is one of those “Left-wing” things that should be a Right-wing thing. After all, you’re far more likely to be aborted if you’re black, poor, disabled or female – the demographics of aborted foetus would give diversity consultants goosepimples if their protected characteristics were visible. And for people obsessed with equality, you don’t get a bigger inequality than life and death.
The second article also addresses the claim that the pro-life movement is merely a fringe religious movement by noting that opposition to slavery also started out as a religious movement:
The pro-life movement does remain strongly religious, which is a weakness, but it does not necessarily mean it is irrational or “unscientific”. Moral campaigns are often dominated by religious groups; once only tiresome weirdo Quakers opposed the natural and universally accepted institution of slavery. We might all now assume slavery is wrong, but to 18th century people it was not obvious.
In fact abortion is one of those “Left-wing” things that should be a Right-wing thing. After all, you’re far more likely to be aborted if you’re black, poor, disabled or female – the demographics of aborted foetus would give diversity consultants goosepimples if their protected characteristics were visible. And for people obsessed with equality, you don’t get a bigger inequality than life and death.
The second article also addresses the claim that the pro-life movement is merely a fringe religious movement by noting that opposition to slavery also started out as a religious movement:
The pro-life movement does remain strongly religious, which is a weakness, but it does not necessarily mean it is irrational or “unscientific”. Moral campaigns are often dominated by religious groups; once only tiresome weirdo Quakers opposed the natural and universally accepted institution of slavery. We might all now assume slavery is wrong, but to 18th century people it was not obvious.
Sunday, September 18, 2011
Peter Schiff Testimony Before the House
Here are a couple excellent videos of excerpts from Peter Schiff's testimony and answering questions before the House committee on the jobs bill and the economy.
Here is the text of his testimony entitled "How the Government Can Create Jobs." If more politicians and inviduals were listening to this well-reasoned and intelligent businessman and others like him we would not be in the mess we are today.
Here is the text of his testimony entitled "How the Government Can Create Jobs." If more politicians and inviduals were listening to this well-reasoned and intelligent businessman and others like him we would not be in the mess we are today.
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Why make a case against conservative views when you can simply misrepresent them?
Liberals excel at slaying strawmen, creating false dichotomies, and generally misrepresenting the views of conservatives. They also like to create absurd, unrealistic scenarios that would make it seem unconscionable to hold conservative views. I see this phenomenon often in the comments sections on Pajamas Media and National Review Online. One common argument of Internet-dwelling liberals is that conservatives want a libertarian paradise like war-torn Liberia or Somalia. And of course, who can forget the frequent and passionate pleas on behalf of all those women who are pregnant after being raped and want to have an abortion? (Proponents of abortion don't talk as often about the remainder of abortions, most of which are performed just because somebody doesn't want to have a baby. See "Why women have abortions".)
Now, I wish to present Exhibit C. Check out this totally unbiased article on Yahoo about a Republican debate, titled "Audience at tea party debate cheers leaving uninsured to die". During the debate, CNN's Wolf Blitzer asked Ron Paul about a hypothetical, uninsured, comatose man and whether he should be left to die. Immediately after this, a few people in the audience shouted, "Yeah!" Personally, I think this outburst was a sarcastic response to a stupid question. The unspoken false dichotomy is that you either have to support Obamacare in its entirety or you want poor people to die. (And you probably hate puppies, too, you bastard.) For all I hear about how nuanced, sophisticated, and intelligent liberals are, they sure aren't very good at making distinctions.
I sincerely doubt that the good and generous people of the United States (and by "people", I mean conservatives) would let our hypothetical man die. Blitzer's silly false dichotomy is nothing but an attempt to make conservative views of limited government and personal freedom seem unconscionable and ridiculous. Harrumph! Harrumph, I say! End rant.
Now, I wish to present Exhibit C. Check out this totally unbiased article on Yahoo about a Republican debate, titled "Audience at tea party debate cheers leaving uninsured to die". During the debate, CNN's Wolf Blitzer asked Ron Paul about a hypothetical, uninsured, comatose man and whether he should be left to die. Immediately after this, a few people in the audience shouted, "Yeah!" Personally, I think this outburst was a sarcastic response to a stupid question. The unspoken false dichotomy is that you either have to support Obamacare in its entirety or you want poor people to die. (And you probably hate puppies, too, you bastard.) For all I hear about how nuanced, sophisticated, and intelligent liberals are, they sure aren't very good at making distinctions.
I sincerely doubt that the good and generous people of the United States (and by "people", I mean conservatives) would let our hypothetical man die. Blitzer's silly false dichotomy is nothing but an attempt to make conservative views of limited government and personal freedom seem unconscionable and ridiculous. Harrumph! Harrumph, I say! End rant.
Labels:
biased journalism,
health care,
media,
rant,
Ron Paul,
Some Dude
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
I kind of like this idea...
Some bar owners in Michigan are angry about being forbidden to allow smoking in their privately-owned bars (you know...the buildings that they paid for with their own money and which customers enter of their own free will) and have banned lawmakers from the premises. (By the way, casinos are exempt from the Michigan smoking ban. Hmmmm...) Now if we could find a way to ban Democrats from the U.S. Capitol...
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Must-see: "Fight For The Children" official video
Natedawg posted in July about a song by the group Christcentric called "Fight For The Children."
While the song and lyrics themselves are powerful, the group has just released an official video that perfectly complements and enhances it. I strongly encourage you to view it. I teared up watching it.
If you can't catch all the lyrics, you can read them here.
While the song and lyrics themselves are powerful, the group has just released an official video that perfectly complements and enhances it. I strongly encourage you to view it. I teared up watching it.
Official Christcentric Video- "Fight For The Children" from Christcentric on Vimeo.
If you can't catch all the lyrics, you can read them here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)